SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
6th September 1957
S.R. DAS, C.J.I., VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B.P. SINHA, KAPUR AND SARKAR, JJ.
Virendra, Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another, Respondents.
K. Narendra, Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another, Respondents.
Petns. Nos. 95 and 96 of 1957
In Petn. No. 95 of 1957
In Petn. N. 96 of 1957
Advocates appeared
Mr. N.C. Chatterjee, Sr. Advocate (M/s. Charan Das Puri and Naunit Lal, Advocates, with him), for Petitioners; In both the petitions. Mr. C. K. Daphtary, Solicitor-General of India and Mr. Lachman Das Koushal, Deputy Advocate-General, for the State of Punjab (Mr. T. M. Den, Advocate, with him), for Respondents, in both the petitions.
-held right in Art. 19 (1) (a) carries with it right to propagate and circulate own views subject to reasonable restrictions.
-see Virendra v. State of Punjab, AIR 1957 SC 896=1958 SC.J 88 = 1958 SCR 308.
-held, provisions are not ultra vires for unwarranted delegation of ligislative power.
Judgement
S. R. DAS CJI.- In these two petitions under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioners call in question the validity of the Punjab Special Powers (Press) Act, 1956 (being Act No. 38 of 1956), hereinafter referred to as "the impugned Act", and pray for an appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to withdraw the Notifications issued by them on the two petitioners as the editors, printers and publishers of two newspapers Pratap and Vir Arjun.
2. The Daily Pratap was started about 38 years back in Lahore, the capital of the united Punjab. It is a daily newspaper printed in the Urdu language and script. Since the partition of the country the Daily Pratap is being published simultaneously from Jullundur and from New Delhi. Vir Arjun is a Hindi daily newspaper also published simultaneously from Jullundur and from New Delhi.
Virendra, the petitioner, in Petition No. 95 of 1957 is the editor, printer and publisher of the two papers published from Jullundur and K. Narendra is the editor, printer and publisher of the two papers published from New Delhi.
3. The petitioners allege that after the appointment of the States Reorganisation Commission on December 29, 1953, the Akali party in the Punjab started a campaign for the partition of the State of Punjab on communal and linguistic basis. According to the petitioners this agitation soon degenerated into a campaign of hatred which threatened the peace of the State. The petitioners maintain that the Hindu inhabitants of the State belonging to all shades of opinion and also a section of the Sikh community and the Congress Party were strongly opposed to that proposal.
It is in the circumstances reasonable to infer that the Hindus would also indulge in a counter propaganda in the Press and from the platform against the agitation started by the Akali party. It is admitted that the policy of these two papers, the Daily Pratap and Vir Arjun, has been to oppose the Akali demand for partition of the State of Punjab. Obviously a good deal of tension was generated in the State by reason of the two bitterly opposing parties trying to propagate their Respective ideologies.
About a year back the Congress Party, which is the ruling party, is said to have surrendered to the communal pressure of the Akalies and accepted what has since come to be known as the regional formula. It was amidst the din and bustle of this ideological war and to prevent and combat any possible activity prejudicial to the maintenance of communal harmony that the Legislature of the State of Punjab found it necessary to pass the impugned Act which received the assent of the President on October 19, 1956, and came into force on the 25th of the same month.
4. The provisions of the impugned Act, in so far as they are material, may now be referred to. Section 2(1)(a) runs as follows:
"2(1) The State Government or any authority so authorised in this behalf if satisfied that such action is or necessary for the purpose of preventing or combating any activity prejudicial to the maintenance of communal harmony affecting or likely to affect public order in writing addressed to a printer, publisher or editor-
(a) prohibit the printing or publication in any document or any class of documents of any matter relating to a particular subject or class of subjects for a specified period or in a particular issue or issues of a newspaper or periodical;
Provided that no such order shall remain in force for more than two months from the making thereof;
Provided further that the person against whom the order has been made may within ten days of the passing of his order make a representation to the state Government which may on consideration thereof modify, confirm or rescind the order,"
Section 2 (1) (b) authorises the State Government or any authority so authorised in this behalf to require that any matter covering not more than two columns be published in any particular issue or issues of a newspaper or periodical on paymen
Relied on : Ramji Lal Modi, Petitioner v. State of U. P.,Respondent
The State of Madras v. V. G. Row
Referred to : Dr. N. B. Khare V. THE STATE OF DELHI
P. J. Ratnam v. D. Kanikaram and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.