SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 83

JAGMOHAN REDDY, MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI
Penumarthy Veera Panasa Ramanna – Appellant
Versus
Penumarthy Sambamoorthy – Respondent


JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal against respondents 1 to 5 arising out of the judgment and decree of the Addl. Subordinate Judge, Eluru. The suit was for ejectment of the respondents from the A and B scheduled properties and to put the appellant in possession of the same, to direct the 1st respondent to pay Rs. 4253-14-9 towards mesne profits and interest on the A scheduled properties and further to direct respondents 2 to 5 to nay the appellant Rs. 163-2-1 as mesne profits and interest on the B schedule proper-ties and further to direct payment of interest on the said amounts and costs of the suit. The following genealogical table will help in the understanding of the contentions raised in this appeal. Penumarti Panasayyafenumarti (died in 1891)Narayanamurthi=papayl (died 1940) (died in 1885)= Bapanammaadopted son Venkanna (died 1943 ). = Rattamma (died 1907)IVeera Pauasa Ramanna (adopted on 9-6-1948) (Plaintiff-appellant)It will be seen from the above genealogy that Panasayya and Narayanamurthi were brothers and it is admitted that they formed a Hindu joint family owning and enjoying A and B scheduled properties along with other properties. The allegations o






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top