SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 430

RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Tulase Mahankali – Appellant
Versus
Andhra University rep. by its Registrar – Respondent


ORDER

Appointment of the 3rd respondent as a lecturer, in the department of Human Genetics of the Andhra University, is questioned in this writ petition, as arbitrary and illegal and a consequential direction is sought to respondents 1 and 2 herein to appoint the petitioner in the said post.

2. Facts, to the extent necessary, are that, vide advertisement No. 18.1/92 dated 17 -10-1992, applications were invited for several posts including that of a lecturer in human genetics and physical anthropology. The qualifications prescribed therein, for appointment to the post of lecturer, is as under:

“a. Good academic record with at least 55% marks or an equivalent grade at Masters Degree level in the relevant subject from an Indian University or an equivalent degree from a Foreign University.

b. Candidates, besides fulfilling the above qualifications should have cleared the eligibility test for Lecturers conducted by U.G.C./C.S.I.R. or similar test accredited by the U.G.C. It may be noted that relaxation from requirement (a) i.e., a minimum of 55% marks at Master Degree level is not permissible in any case. However, the candidates belonging to the following categories are exempted from the req









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top