SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1404

G. ROHINI
Kakatiya University, rep. by its Registrar – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization – Respondent


ORDER

Kakatiya University, Hanamkonda, Warangal District is the petitioner in these two writ petitions which are filed aggrieved by the proceedings initiated under the provisions of Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, the Act) for recovery of arrears towards PF contributions in respect of casual workers and daily wage workers including temporary employees working in the University.

2. The petitioner University which was established under the Kakatiya University Act, 1991, is governed by the provisions of A.P. Universities Act, 1991. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitions, it is stated that to meet the administrative requirements the University has been engaging the service of casual workers and daily wage workers from time to time and the said appointments are purely temporary in nature. As clarified by the Government of A.P., unless the services of the above said employees are regularized in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance, dated 22-4-1994, they are not eligible for getting minimum pay scale and they are not also entitled for provident fund benefits. It was made clear by the Government of A.P. by letter dated 6-3-1998 that th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top