SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 30

G.YETHIRAJULU
Aitha Dubba Rajam @ Raju – Appellant
Versus
Aitha Pochaiah – Respondent


O R D E R

This Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.29 of 2002 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet. The respondents are the defendants in the said suit. The suit was filed for partition of the suit schedule lands into four equal shares and to allot one such share to the

plaintiff.

2. A preliminary decree was passed on 30-08-2003 declaring that the petitioner is entitled to 1/4th share and a Commissioner was appointed in the final decree petition and the Commissioner divided the properties into four equal shares and the petitioner has to be allotted one such share. The defendants 1 to 11 remained ex parte and respondent No. 12 was impleaded by order in I.A.No.239 of 2005. She filed a counter in the final decree petition stating that part of the suit property was purchased by her under a sale deed of the year 1995 and she was also inducted into possession thereof and she is in possession and enjoyment of the property. The plaintiff behind her back obtained an ex parte decree against the other respondents including her property also for partition. The plaintiff filed I.A.No.280 of 2003 for passing a final decree and in pursuance of that, the lands were divi


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top