SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 11

A. GOPAL REDDY, G. YETHIRAJULU
T. Deveswar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Asst. Director of Agrl. (R) Hyd. , Urban – Respondent


C O M M O N O R D E R

(per the Ho’ble Mr.Justice

A. Gopal Reddy)

These three Criminal Petitions involving common questions of fact and law were heard together and are being disposed of by this Common Order.

2. A learned Single Judge of this Court who heard Criminal Petition Nos.4111 and 4114 of 2003 noticing the conflicting views in M/s THUNGABHDRA CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS COMPANY LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE (REGU-LAR) YERRAGONDAPALEM(1) and in T. DEVESWAR REDDY, AREA MANAGER, M/S NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS LIMITED VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICUTLURE, HYDERABAD(2) on the question as to whether the law laid down by this Court in DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CUNTUR AND OTEHRS vs. STATE OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND OTEHRS(3), would also apply to offences committed prior to 30.6.1999 the date of order of the Division Bench, by order dated 7.6.2006 referred the matter for an authoritative pronouncement by a Division Bench.

3. Subsequently, when Criminal Petition No.5801 of 2003 involving consideration of similar question of law was taken up for hearing by one of us (AGRJ), it was represented that Crl. Petition Nos.4111 and 4114 of 2003 involving identical question

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top