SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1565

L. NARASIMHA REDDY
P. Prabhakara Rao – Appellant
Versus
P. Krishna – Respondent


JUDGMENT :-These second appeals are in between the same parties and in respect of the same property. They arise out of two suits, which were clubbed and disposed of together.

2. The appellant is the owner of Plot No.38, Municipal No. 10-3-32/9/35, East Marredpally, Secunderabad; admeasuring 388.8 Sq.yards. He is the original allottee of the said plot by a Co-operative Housing Society, and purchased the same through the sale deed, dated 26-10-1977. The appellant was an employee of Geological Survey of India (GSI), and he mortgaged the plot on 28-4-1984 to the President of India, to obtain loan for construction of house. The respondent is related to the appellant. According to the appellant, a portion of the house was given, on rent, to the respondent, and the rent was paid regularly, till January 1996, and thereafter, the latter committed default. Appellant got issued a notice, dated 10-3-1997, requiring the respondent to vacate the premises.

3. A reply dated 23-3-1997 was got issued by the respondent, disputing the very ownership of the appellant, over the plot. He stated that, when he was attempting to purchase the house, the appellant volunteered to sell half portion of his propert





























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top