SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1567

V.V.S.RAO
Neralla Dhanunjaya – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Warangal – Respondent


ORDER :-A short question as to the liability of a Municipal body to compensate the owner of a house, which is demolished by such Municipality without notice, would arise in this writ petition.

The background of the case, in brief, is as under.

2. The petitioner is owner of an old house bearing No.13-1-156 (old No.13/134) situated at SVN Road, Warangal, within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation of Warangal (the Corporation, for brevity). On 14-3-1995 at 10.30 a.m., several employees of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 including Building Inspector, Sri Anwar Ali came to petitioners house with bulldozer and started demolishing the same. The petitioner and his son unsuccessfully tried to stop them. The petitioner and his son were allegedly detained by the Police Officer of P.S. Matwada. They were released at 10.00 p.m., on the same day. When they came home, petitioner found his house demolished to the extent of 5 to 8 feet in its entire width of 40 feet. The petitioner also alleges that earlier on 17-11-1994 at the instance of third respondent, the then District Collector, Respondent Nos.1 and 2 tried to demolish the house when he protested. He allegedly sent telegraphic notices to Resp



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top