SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1165

BILAL NAZKI
United India Insurance Company limited – Appellant
Versus
Koduru Bhagyamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
Counsel for appellant: Mr. T. Mahender Rao.
Counsel for Respondent: Mr. L.J. Veera Reddy.

ORDER

(Per Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bilal Nazki)

This case has come before this Court on a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court as it was contended before the learned single Judge by the appellant that as the trailer in which the deceased was traveling was not insured, although it was attached to the tractor which was insured, therefore no liability could be fastened upon the insurer.

2. The appeal arises out of the award granting compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- to the legal representatives of the deceased who died in a motor accident.

3. The appellant placed reliance on judgments of this Court reported in Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Janarasupalli Kotiratnamma 1 and Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Laxmanna 2. The respondents/claimants placed reliance on a judgment of this Court reported in New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Mamidi Mallamma 3, which according to the respondents, lays down that if one among the tractor and trailer is insured, the liability can be fastened upon the insurer. All these three judgments have been rendered by the learned single Judges of this Court. Therefore, the learned single Judge thought it proper to refer th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top