GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
Mothukuri Ranga Rao – Appellant
Versus
Royyala Laxminarayana – Respondent
2. Before going into the issue whether the order passed by this Court can be reviewed or not and the legal position thereof, it is necessary to refer to the facts involved in this revision. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in CRP No.6929 of2005.
3. The petitioner, Royyala Laxmi Narayana, filed an application under Section 32 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for brevity "the Tenancy Act") for declaration that he is in undisputed possession of the petition schedule property and also for restoration of possession of the lands in question. The Mandal Revenue Officer, before whom the application was filed, conducted a detailed enquiry, and by his order dated 30.3.1998, dismissed the application. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Joint Collector, Warangal, under Section 90 of the Tenancy Act, along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of about 153 days in filing the appeal. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.