SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 292

P.S.NARAYANA
Peddamatam Siddamma – Appellant
Versus
M. Veeraiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Counsel for Appellant: Sri Ashok Kumar
Counsel for Respondent: Prasad

JUDGMENT:

On 19-9-1997 this Court made the following Order in the Second Appeal :-

"In view of the substantial question of law raised in ground Nos.10, 11 and 12, the Second Appeal is admitted."

On 19-9-1997 itself in C.M.P.No.13982 of 1997, interim stay was granted subject to condition of the appellant depositing costs within four weeks from today.

2. The substantial questions of law, on the strength of which the Second Appeal had been admitted, as specified above, are as hereunder:-

1. Whether the Courts below right in entertaining a suit for declaration of title and possession when, certificate is granted under the A.P.Inams Abolition (TA) Act, 1955, when title is granted by the competent authority under the Act, whether the suit is barred under the Act.

2. Whether the Courts below committed an error of law in decreeing the suit basing on revenue records such as Ex.A.16, Ex.A.21, Ex.A.22 and Ex.A.24. Whether the Courts erred in not following the settled principles of law as laid down by the highest Court of the land, that the revenue records maintained for the purpose of collecting land revenue and does not confirm any title as laid down in 1996 (6) Supreme 385.

3. W





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top