SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 1147

G.YETHIRAJULU
Dasari Pullareddy – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Counsel for Petitioners: C. Praveen Kumar
Counsel for respondent: Pubic Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

This Appeal is preferred by the accused in S.C.No.36 of 2000 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa.

2. A-1 was charged for the offences under Sections 20 (b) (i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short "NDPS Act") for possessing ganja of 13 bags weighing 130 KGs on 04-01-2000. A-2 was also charged for 20 (a) (1) of the NDPS Act for cultivating ganja plants in the land measuring an extent of Ac.1-40 cents of Pochammareddipalli in Sy.No.128/2.

3. It is alleged by the prosecution that on 04-01-2000 at about 6-30 AM, the Inspector, his men and the mediators went to Pochammareddipalli village and when they were waiting near "Vanka" towards southern side of the village, at a distance of about 11/2 KM, a double bullock cart loaded with gunny bags was being driven by one person sitting on the cart and another person was following the cart. On seeing the police party, they attempted to run away. The police surrounded and caught hold of them. On ascertaining, they disclosed their identity as A.1 and A.2 and A-1 informed that he was eking out his livelihood by selling ganja by purchasing it from the village a


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top