G.YETHIRAJULU
Koganti Sujani – Appellant
Versus
Vissamsetti Sankar Babu – Respondent
This revision petition has been preferred by the fourth defendant in O.S. No.30 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District.
(2) The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration that he is the absolute owner of 1/3rd share in the plaint schedule property, for perpetual injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs. The suit was numbered by accepting the value of the property and the Court fee was paid. Five years after the filing of the suit, the fourth defendant filed I.A. No.278 of 2007 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to direct the plaintiff to pay deficit Court fee on the ground that the plaintiff has admitted in an application for amendment of the plaint that the property is worth more than one crore rupees. The suit was filed in 2002 and amendment petition was filed in 2006, that is four years after filing the suit mentioning that the property covered by item No.1 fetches more than one crore rupees. Para 8-A was added to the plaint as per amendment order in I.A. No.1009 of 2006 dated 30-10-2006. In that para the relevant portion reads that Item No.1 of the plaint schedule property is worth more than a crore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.