Common Order: (B. Chandra Kumar, J.)

Heard the learned counsel.

2. Since all these Applications are interconnected, they are being disposed of by this common order.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

In the suit in C.S.No.14 of 1958 filed by one Dildarunnisa Begum and others for partition of Matruka properties of Khurshid Jah Paiga, a preliminary decree was passed on 28-06-1963. The parties in Application No.729 of 2007 have compromised the matter out of the Court. Accordingly, they have filed a compromise memo along with a plan signed by all the parties and consequently the compromise had been recorded on 23-08-2007.

4. M/s. IDPL Employees Cooperative House Building Society Ltd., Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “IDPL Housing Society”) had filed Application No.728 of 2007 along with a plan showing A-schedule property to pass final decree in C.S.No.14 of 1958 to the extent of Ac.58-00 out of out of Ac.65-00 in Sy.No.163 of Hydernagar Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Basing on the same, a final decree had been passed on 23-08-2007. The specific case of the IDPL Housing Society is that by mistake it had wrongly mentioned the western side mea