V.V.S.RAO
G. Muneswaran – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad – Respondent
Petitioner seeks invalidation of the order of August 2001 passed by the third respondent whereby and whereunder in purported exercise of power under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act, for brevity), he deducted money awarded for well and pipeline separately from total compensation, which was awarded earlier.
2. Petitioner is owner of land admeasuring about Ac.0.17 1/2 in Survey No.764/3 and Ac.0.05 in Survey No.764/15 situated at Vadderapalle Village of Puthalapattu Mandal in Chittoor District. The said land and other lands of the village were acquired for public purpose, namely, construction of barrage across Ponnai River near Kalvakunta Village. Third respondent passed Award No.8/200l-2002, dated 7.7.2001, awarding a sum of Rs.1,52,778/- which includes land value and value for structures/well. The details - as tabulated in Land Acquisition Officer's award; are as follows:
Survey No. Extent acquired Land value Structures Well Tree 30% of solatium Total
764/3 0.15 1/2 7,750 - 1,39,453 - 2,325 1,49,528
0.02
764/1 0.05 2,500 -
Abdul Sattar v. District Collector, Nizamabad
Bhera Ram v. State of Rajasthan
Bihar Finance Service H. C. Co op Soc. Ltd. v Gautam Goswami
Dwaraka Das v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Jayakrishna Manharaj Mohapatra v. State of Orissa
Jayalakshmi Coelho v. Oswald Joseph Coelho
Kuruvilla Thomas v. State Bank of Travancore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.