SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 676

V.V.S.RAO
G. Muneswaran – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.V Sesha Sai, Counsel for the Petitioner; Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

ORDER :-

Petitioner seeks invalidation of the order of August 2001 passed by the third respondent whereby and whereunder in purported exercise of power under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act, for brevity), he deducted money awarded for well and pipeline separately from total compensation, which was awarded earlier.

2. Petitioner is owner of land admeasuring about Ac.0.17 1/2 in Survey No.764/3 and Ac.0.05 in Survey No.764/15 situated at Vadderapalle Village of Puthalapattu Mandal in Chittoor District. The said land and other lands of the village were acquired for public purpose, namely, construction of barrage across Ponnai River near Kalvakunta Village. Third respondent passed Award No.8/200l-2002, dated 7.7.2001, awarding a sum of Rs.1,52,778/- which includes land value and value for structures/well. The details - as tabulated in Land Acquisition Officer's award; are as follows:

Survey No. Extent acquired Land value Structures Well Tree 30% of solatium Total

764/3 0.15 1/2 7,750 - 1,39,453 - 2,325 1,49,528

0.02

764/1 0.05 2,500 -




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top