SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 402

P.A.CHOUDHARY
In the matter of State Bank of India, Eluru – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Ramgopal, for Appellant.

JUDGMENT:-

The facts:- The plaintiff, the State Bank of India, Eluru Branch is the appellant. It appeals against a judgment of the learned District Judge, Eluru who in A.S.No. 151 of 1980 confirmed the judgment of the trial Court dismissing a suit filed by the Bank for recovery of a sum of money advanced by the Bank as loan to an agriculturist. The Bank sued its debtor, who is an agriculturist, in O.S.No. 176 of 1979 on the file of the district Munsif, Eluru for recovery of a sum of Rs. 8,260.20. That amount was made up of the principal and compounded interest due on the loan minus the part payments made by the defendant-agriculturist from time to time.

2. The principal sum the defendant borrowed from the plaintiff was only Rs.7,200/- and that amount was secured by a mortgage. But that amount soared to be the suit amount even after the defendant had made part payments because of the stipulation of agreement providing for payment of compound interest. The loan agreement provided for the payment of 1½ of interest over and above the prevailing bank rate but subject to a condition of the debtor paying a minimum of 8½% per annum with quarterly rate on the borrowed amount. Thus the princip
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top