SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 463

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Dugge Venkataiah – Appellant
Versus
Bellamkonda Meri Dhanamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:P. Prabhakara Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Radha Krishna Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 18.02.2011, in I.A.No.728 of 2010 in O.S.No.137 of 2010 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.

2. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent for perpetual injunction. The suit summons were served on the petitioners on 31.07.2010. The petitioners filed a detailed counter affidavit in the IA filed by the respondent for temporary injunction on 06.08.2010. Even though the petitioners were required to file the written statement within 90 days of service of summons as envisaged in Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, they have failed to file the written statement within the stipulated time and as such, their right to file the written statement was forfeited on 21.12.2010. Therefore, the petitioners filed I.A.No.728 of 2010 under Section 151 CPC to receive the written statement. The trial Court on considering the rival pleas of the parties rejected the said application by the order under revision.

3. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the trial Court has observed that the reasons put forth by the petitioners, namely, that petitioner No.1 fell ill due to jaundice

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top