SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 602

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Pothuraju Narasaiah – Appellant
Versus
Suroju Nagamani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J.P. Srikant, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Hari Sreedhar, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This Revision is preferred by the 1st defendant in the Suit, calling in question the orders passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Khamman in I.A. No.111 of 2010 filed in O.S. No.15 of 2007, instituted by the plaintiffs-respondents 1 and 2 herein.

2. O.S. No.15 of 2007 was instituted seeking specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 23-09-2006 entered into by and between these parties. Subsequent to the institution of the Suit, defendants 2 to 6 got impleaded therein resisting the intended sale by the 1st defendant on the ground that it is a joint family property. I.A. No.111 of 2010 was moved hence, seeking amendment of the plaint for introduction of an alternative relief for repayment of the advance sale price of Rs.3,60,000/- received by the petitioner herein together with interest thereon @ 12% per annum from the respective dates of receipt of the said money till the date of repayment. The said I.A., was resisted on variety of grounds including that the claim for refund of the advance sale consideration amount was barred by limitation. Finding that the nature of amendment sought for, does not result in altering the nature of the cause in the S

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top