MADAN B.LOKUR, SANJAY KUMAR
Jairaj Ispat Limited – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep. by its Secretary – Respondent
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per SK, J.)
The Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission entertained a Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) claim made by the Andhra Pradesh Power Co-ordination Committee on behalf of the four Distributing Companies (DISCOMS) in the State for the financial year 2008-09 and by its proceedings dated 05.06.2010 permitted them to levy FSA charges as indicated therein on all consumers, except LT agricultural consumers, for the four quarters of that financial year. The proceedings dated 05.06.2010 came to be challenged before this Court in a batch of writ petitions by aggrieved consumers.
2. The learned Judge who heard the writ petitions at great length framed the following questions for consideration:
1) Whether the writ petitions are maintainable in view of the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003, against the impugned order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission?
2) Whether the Andhra Pradesh Power Co-ordination Committee constituted under G.O.Ms.No.59 dated 07.06.2005 has locus standi to file an application on behalf of the four Distributing Companies?
3) Whether the appl
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar: AIR 1955 SC 661. (Para 27)
Maya Mathew v. State of Kerala: 2010 (3) SCJ 720. (Para 29)
Balwant Singh v. Jagdish Singh: (2010) 8 SCC 685. (Para 32)
Salem Advocates Bar Association
Ajoy Kumar Banerjee v. Union of India: (1984) 3 SCC 127. (Para 38)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.