C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Raavi Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Broadly, these cases arise on account of the action of the Registering Officers of the Registration and Stamps Department in different parts of the State of Andhra Pradesh in not receiving and registering sale deeds or other documents executed for transfer of immovable properties. The acts of refusal are based on different reasons. When some of these cases came up before this Court on 14-11-2012, this Court has noticed alarming rise in the number of cases being filed with the complaint of non-registration of the properties in recent times. This Court has also noticed that most of the cases of refusal to register are due to reasons, which this Court has, on many earlier occasions, held as unsustainable and falling outside the scope of the provisions of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short "the Act"). That even though the law is well settled on several aspects, the Registering authorities have been again and again raising the same objections for registration of the properties which were earlier rejected by this Court. As the spate of the litigation was continuing unabated, as evident from the fact that in the year 2012 itself, as many as 3360 Writ Petitions
Akkem Anjaiah v. Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Basant Nahata v. State of Rajasthan
K.M. Kamallula Basha and others v. District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor and others
P. Suresh v. A.P. State, represented by its District Collector, Kadapa and others
P.V. Rajendra Kumar v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.