SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 916

A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
Veesarapu Padma – Appellant
Versus
Rangineni Anitha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Raghuveer Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mahipathi Rao, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by order dated 11.02.2013 in O.S. No.90 of 2008 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, wherein the Court below overruled the objection of the revision petitioner/defendant regarding the objection taken to mark Ex.A1, agreement of sale on the ground that it requires stamp duty and also registration, since Ex.A1 agreement of sale shows possession was delivered as on the date of execution to the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition are as follows:

The respondent/plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 21.01.2004. When the plaintiff want to mark the same in the suit as Ex.A1, the revision petitioner/defendant has taken objection stating that the document contains clause regarding delivery of possession. As such, it requires payment of stamp duty as well as registration. The said objection was overruled by the Court below on the ground that the respondent/plaintiff purchased stamp worth Rs.35,000/- for the purpose of executing the registered sale deed by the revision petitioner. Since, the revision petitioner refused to exec





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top