P.NAVEEN RAO
Ram Lal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director – Respondent
1. With the consent of learned counsels for the petitioner and respondents, this petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
2. Petitioner operates petroleum retail outlet. The outlet was provided with four dispensing units. Three of them from L&T company and one dispensing unit supplied by MIDCO. Periodically the retail outlet was inspected thoroughly and at no point of time, the inspecting officers noticed any deviation or malfunctioning or existence of external part in any dispensing unit was pointed out. The Legal and Metrological Department after conducting periodical inspections fixes seals on the units and all the seals were found intact.
3. On 13.02.2013 inspection team visited the premises of the retail outlet and conducted detailed inspection. In the forenoon when inspection was conducted nothing adverse was noticed and a favourable report was drawn. In the afternoon, in the absence of petitioner earlier report was reversed and an adverse report was drawn. The report alleges presence of double gear in one of the dispensing units. It also alleges on various issues concerning over all functioning of the outlet and its staff. However, the inspecting unit did not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.