S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar, JJ.
M.D., H.S.I.D.C. and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Hari Om Enterprises and Anr. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1089 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 14074 of 2006] WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4090,4130,4091,4092,4093,4094,4095,4097,4098 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 16541, 16708, 16711, 19833, 19916, 19949, 20235, 17426, 18011 OF 2006]
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4099,4101,4100,4102 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 2331, 2343, 2702 and 2891 OF 2007]
DECIDED ON: 05-16-2008
B. Contract Act, 1872, Section 55 - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Writ jurisdiction - Contractual matters - Industrial Development Corporation - Allotments of industrial plots – Payment of allotement money to be made by instalments - Time schedule to start production also specified - Penalty clause in case of failure to adhere to the payment schedule also stipulated - Resumption of plot - Cannot be automatic in the event of default - Resumption could be resorted only after failure to comply with show cause notice.
C. Contract Act, 1872, Sections 54 and 55 - Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Writ jurisdiction - Contractual matters - Industrial Development Corporation - Allotments of industrial plots – Government contract - Time for raising construction of building and starting production stipulated in the letter of allotment - Delay in giving actual possession – Also delay sanctioning plan by the corporation - Action of resumption of plot - Arbitrary - Liable to be set aside.
[Para 37]
D. Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Government contract - Writ jurisdiction - Contractual matters - Industrial Development Corporation - Allotments of industrial plots – Terms of payment stipulated in different clauses found irreconcilable - Cancellation of allotment for default in payment - Arbitrarily - Plot re-allotted to third party after resumption - Petition challenging order of resumption – Third party not made party in writ petition - High Court setting aside resumption - Order affects the interest of third party - Directed to be suitably compensated.
E. Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 226 - Government contract - Writ jurisdiction - Contractual matters - Industrial Development Corporation - Allotments of industrial plots – Cancellation of industrial plot allotted – Application for sanction of building plan – Sanction refused by Corporation for want of ownership clearance - Resumption on the ground of breach of time schedule fixed for construction - Corporation considering building plan even after resumption of plot – Assumed to have had waived its right - Resumption totally illegal and arbitrary.
F. Constitution of India, Articles 133 and 226 - Writ jurisdiction - Writ jurisdiction - Contractual matters - Industrial Development Corporation - Allotments of industrial plots – Writ petition against order of resumption - Interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction - High Court set aside resumption order without assigning sufficient reasons - Not proper - Offer made to re-allot the plots on payment of price as per the current rate - Direction issued to re-allot the plots to the allottees willing to pay the prevalling rates as on the date of judgment of the High Court.
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J - Leave granted.
2. Validity of orders of recession of allotment of industrial plots and resumption thereof by the appellants herein is in question in this batch of appeals.
3. With a view to appreciate the questions involved herein, the factual matrix of the matter, however, would be noticed from Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 14074 of 2006.
4. Appellant - Corporation is a public sector undertaking. Its principal function is allotment of industrial plots belonging to the State of Haryana. It was set up as a catalyst for promoting economic growth and accelerating the pace of industrialization. It not only provides financial assistance to the industrial concerns by way of term loans; it also develops infrastructure for setting up of industrial units. The Corporation also invests money in developing the industrial estates at strategic locations. In exercise of its functions, it also allots industrial plots to entrepreneurs for setting up their industries on "no profit no loss" basis. The entrepreneurs, according to the Corporation, must be the deserving ones. For the said purpose, it keeps in mind the principle that allotment of land should not be made to speculators who invest in property for getting high returns on escalation of price.
5. Respondent No. 1 is a partnership firm. It was previously known as M/s. Dysa International (Firm). It applied for allotment of 1000 sq. m. size plot in IMT, Manesar. The Allotment Committee of the Corporation having found the respondent to be eligible for allotment, allotted plot No. 177 in Sector 6, IMT, Manesar measuring 1012.50 sq. m. wherefor a letter of allotment was issued on 10.01.2001.
6. We may notice the relevant clauses thereof.
7. Note appended to Clause 3 of the said letter of allotment states that in the event of failure to comply with the terms and conditions by the Regular Letter of Appointment (RLA) holder, the allotment of an Industrial plot/ shed, within the stipulated period, the RLA shall automatically lapse and 10% application money deposited towards the cost of the plot/shed shall be refunded without any interest. However, if the allottee makes a request for the surrender of the plot/shed after complying with the terms and conditions, then the Principal amount will be refunded without any interest after making a deduction of 10% of the cost of the plot/shed.
8. Clause 4 provides for other Terms and Conditions governing schedule of payment of the balance 75% of the price of plot/shed.
9. Clause 6 provides for the consequences of non-payment of the balance amount or non-fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the Letter of Allotment/Agreement. In such an event, the RLA shall stand withdrawn with the resumption of the plot/shed and refund of the deposit without any interest with 10% deduction.
10. Clause 8 provides for the Schedule of Construction and "Going into Production". It mandates the allottee to commence construction of building as per the approved building plans within a period of one year from the date of the offer of possession. The allottee will be required to start commercial production within a period of three years from the date of offer of possession. Extension for commencement of construction can be granted for 6 months maximum if circumstances were beyond the control of the allottee. Similarly, extension of one year can be granted for commencement of commercial production for reasons beyond its control and only if 10% of the permissible area has been constructed and effective steps taken for completion of project subject to payment of the extension fee.
11. An allottee will be deemed to have completed the project if he constructs minimum 25% of the permissible covered area and starts commercial production within the period specified therein.
12. Clause 14 provides for consequences of non-adherence to the schedule of payment and schedule of implementation. In such an event and on an unsatisfactory reply to the show cause not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.