SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(AP) 726

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Naram Bhoomi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Naram Venkat Reddy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioner: Sri Keerthi Prabhaker
For respondent No.2: Sri Pavan Kumar Sharma

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 24-9-2012 in I.A.No.1019 of 2010 in O.S.No.283 of 1997 on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.

The petitioner filed the above mentioned I.A. before the lower Court for coming on record as the legal representative of the sole plaintiff, who died after obtaining preliminary decree dated 11-2-2009 for partition. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that he is the nephew of the plaintiff who died leaving behind two registered Wills dated 4-6-2004 and 12-3-2009 bequeathing the properties which are the subject matter of the suit, in his favour. The respondents filed a counter- affidavit wherein they have mainly pleaded that the petitioner has not obtained the Probate of the Wills under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, (for short "the Act") in the absence of which he cannot be impleaded as the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff. The Court below, by the order assailed in this Revision Petition, dismissed the application by accepting the objection of the respondents that the petitioner cannot represent the deceased plaintiff unless he obtained the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top