VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
T. Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar – Respondent
1. The writ petitions are directed against the common order dated 02.07.2011 in case No.D1/28/2005 (File No.D1/6814/2005) and case No.D1/14/2009 (File No.D1/1715/2009) passed by the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar, first respondent herein, allowing separate revision petitions filed by the third respondent in each of the writ petitions.
2. The relevant facts in these writ petitions are required to be stated in detail in order to appreciate the issue involved.
(a) Petitioner No.1 is the son of petitioner No.2. The vendor of the petitioners viz. Late G. Raghuveer Rao, was granted occupancy certificate under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short Inams Act) in proceedings No.K/4439/87 dated 19.12.1987 covering Sy.Nos.727 (Ac.7.15 guntas); 731 (Ac.16.09 guntas) and 734 (Ac.8.21 guntas) guntas at Keshampet Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar. It appears that similar certificate was also granted for Sy.No.732. However, that certificate is not part of the record. The third respondent in WP.No.34203 of 2013, hereinafter referred to as G. Rama Rao, who claims to be the brother of the said Raghuveer Rao, questioned the said occupancy certificate by filing
BASIREDDY RUKMINAMMA v. THE JOINT COLLECTOR
MUNSHA SINGH DHAMAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB (AIR 1960 P&H 317)
Amar Singh v. Custodian Evacuee Property
C. PANDURANGAM v. MRO, SERILINGAMPALLY MANDAL, R.R. DIST.
KOLA SATYA RAO v. JOINT COLLECTOR (2010 (3) ALD 439)
Hari Shankar v. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury AIR 1963 SC 698
K. SEETHARAMA REDDY v. HASSAN ALI KHAN (2003 (1) ALD 563 (DB))
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.