Since these two revisions arise out of one suit and the reasons assigned by the Court below in the impugned orders are also the same and since they are interrelated, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of these two revisions by way of this Common Order.

Heard Sri K. Raghuveer Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Syam Sunder, learned counsel for the respondent, apart from perusing the material available on record.

C.R.P. No.1743 of 2014 assails the order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, allowing I.A.No.636 of 2011 in O.S.No.17 of 2000 filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. C.R.P.No.1744 of 2014 is filed against the order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the said Court, allowing I.A.No.637 of 2011 in O.S.No.17 of 2000 filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein under the provisions of Order 18 Rule 17 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The respondent herein instituted O.S.No.17 of 2000, seeking declaration of title, for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property and for cancellation of decree in O.S.No.654 of 1980. In the said suit, the defendant/petition