Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, J.

1. This revision is preferred by the petitioner in E.A. SR. No. 2714 of 2014 in E.P. No. 63 of 2011 in O.S. No. 468 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge's Court, Anaparathy. The 1st respondent herein was the auction purchaser while the 2nd respondent was the decree holder and the 3rd respondent was the judgment debtor. The petitioner/claim petitioner is a stranger/third party, though the judgment debtor was his brother.

2. The E.P. No. 63 of 2011 is moved by the 2nd respondent/decree holder for executing the decree passed in O.S. No. 468 of 2008 and in that process immovable property of a total extent of 82 1/2 cents has been brought to sale by public auction on 09.12.2011. The 1st respondent emerged as the best bidder and his offer to purchase the schedule property for Rs. 2,25,000/- has been accepted by the Court and the sale was accordingly confirmed on 04.06.2012 by the Junior Civil Judge at Anaparthi. Thereafter the 1st respondent/auction purchaser moved E.A. No. 127 of 2012 under Rule 95 of Order XXI, CPC for delivery of the property purchased by him. Accordingly the immovable property has been delivered on 16.11.2013 and hence E.A. No. 1