B. Manjula vs District Collector, Civil Supplies

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 Supreme(AP) 1440

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
B. Manjula – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Civil Supplies – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: K. Rajanna
For Respondents/Defendant: Assistant Government Pleader

ORDER

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

1. This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside order dated Nil-4-2011 of respondent No. 3 and orders dated 3-8-2011 and 1-12-2011 of respondent Nos. 2 and 1, passed in the appeal and revision, respectively.

2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow compass. The petitioner's fair price shop was inspected by the Tahsildar, Gonegandla Mandal. The charges framed based on the said inspection and the explanation offered thereto by the petitioner, as reflected in the impugned order, are as follows:

Sl. No.	Charges Framed	Explanation offered by the dealer/petitioner
1.	There are no entries in stock register of rice	The dealer has explained that she received P.D.S. rice on 2-2-2011 and get the release orders from the Mandal Revenue Inspector on 3.2.2011 and started distribution of rice and distributed upto 48 Qtls. On 4^th & 5^th marriage at Adoni returned on 8^th and again she went to attend alliance at Adoni and could not make entries as she returned on 10^th
2.	Rice stock has been compared with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2014 Supreme(AP) 1440

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYB. Manjula – AppellantVersusDistrict Collector, Civil Supplies – Respondent

Cases Referred (20)

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
B. Manjula – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Civil Supplies – Respondent