M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
M. A. Faheem Uddin – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Nayeem – Respondent
This Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the order, dated 15-10-2015, passed in I.A.No.634 of 2015 in OP.No.235 of 2014 by the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge and Election Tribunal, Nizamabad.
The Revision petitioner was the petitioner before the Tribunal and the 1st respondent was the election petitioner/respondent and they will be hereinafter referred to as revision petitioner and 1st respondent for convenience of reference.
The revision petitioner (the 1st respondent in Election petition) filed petition under Sections 71, 72 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act (for short the “Act”) and rule 100 (3) of A.P.Municipal Corporations (Conduct of Election of Members) Rules, 2005 (“for short “Election Rules, 2005”) alleging that he contested for the office of Corporator from Division/ward No.29, Nizamabad Municipal Corporation held on 30-03-2014. The revision petitioner was declared as elected for the Division/ward on 12-05-2014 having secured highest number of votes among nine contested rival candidat
M.Ranga Reddy v. N.Indrasena Reddy
Kummari Ramulu v. Gangaram Penta Reddy and others
M.Khalellulla Baig v. Mulla Khaja Mohiuddin and others
Michael B.Fernades v. C.K.Jaffer Sharief and others
B.Sundra Rami Reddy v. Election Commission of India and others
Dwijendra Lal Sen Gupta v. Kare Krishna Konar
Mallikarjunappa and Another v. Shamanur Shivashankarappa and others
Sardar Harcharan Singh Brar v. Sukh Darshan Singh
Umesh Challiyill v. K.P.Rajendran
Ponnala Lakshmaiah vs Kommuri Pratap Reddy and Others
H.D.Revanna vs. G.Puttaswamy and Others
Mohan Raj v. Surendra Kumar Taparia and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.