M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Sarala Jain – Appellant
Versus
Sangu Gangadhar – Respondent
This revision petition is filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3-defendant Nos. 1 to 3 in I.A.No. 1390 of 2012 in O.S.No. 322 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nizamabad (for short, 'the trial Court'), under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the order dated 23-11-2015 passed by the trial Court appointing an advocate commissioner to fix boundaries of schedule property by exercising power under Order 26 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'C.P.C.'). For convenience of reference, the ranks given to the parties before the trial Court will be adopted throughout this order.
The petitioner-plaintiff filed the suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents-defendants and for demarcation of schedule property alleging that he was the absolute owner of agricultural land in S.No. 329 of an extent of Ac. 18.32 guntas situated at Nadepalli Village Sivaru, Dichpally Mandal, Nizamabad District. The petitioner succeeded the same from his father Sangu Buchanna, S/o Chinnanna. Out of Ac. 18.32 guntas, the petitioner sold an extent of Ac. 15.11 guntas to the respondents while retaining Ac. 3.21 guntas for hi
Yenugonda Bal Reddy Vs. Manemma and others (2011 (2) ALD 472) – Referred.
Batchu Narayana Rao Vs. Batchu Venkata Narasimha Rao (2010 (5) ALD 83) – Referred.
E.Achuthan Nair Vs. P.Narayanan Nair and another (1987) 4 SCC 71) – Referred.
Malla Bhaskara Rao and others Vs. Konchada Ananda Rao (1999 (5) ALD 113) – Referred.
Haryana Waqf Board and others Vs. Shanti Sarup and others (2008) 8 SCC 671) – Applied.
Government of the State of Orissa, Bhubaneshwar Vs. Jaldu Rama Rao and Company
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.