RAMESH RANGANATHAN, U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
M. J. Tirumala Aqua & Agro Products Pvt. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-II – Respondent
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
The proceedings under challenge in this writ petition is the order passed by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner dated 07.06.2016, for the tax period April, 2013 to August, 2015, confirming the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.03.2016 levying penalty on the petitioner under Section 53(3) of the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short the Act).
The petitioner herein is a registered dealer on the rolls of the 2nd respondent, and is engaged in the business of milling of paddy and sale of rice. An assessment order was passed by the 1st respondent dated 30.11.2015 holding that there was a huge variation, between the turnover reported in the returns and in the audited books of accounts, for the tax period 2013-14 and 2014-15. The petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by way of W.P.No.1858 of 2016 which was dismissed by order dated 25.01.2016 on the ground that the petitioner had the alternative remedy of preferring an appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner. The petitioner approached the Appellate Authority who dismissed the appeal on 30.05.2016. Consequent thereto, the assessment order attained finality.
Even before the appeal was
Syed Yakoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan
Sree Krishna Electricals v. State of Tamil Nadu
Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. CCE
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. N.R. Vairamani
Sri Konaseema Co-operative Central Bank Ltd v. N. Seetharama Raju
Deepak Bajaj v. State of Maharashtra
Uniworth Textiles Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.