RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J.UMA DEVI
Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Y. Thirupalu, Guntur District – Respondent
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
1. This appeal, under clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.33167 of 1997, which was disposed of along with W.P. Nos.33139 of 1997 and batch dated 10.10.2007. W.P. No.33139 of 1997 and batch was filed by the workmen aggrieved by the awards passed by the Industrial Tribunal-I, Hyderabad, in separate I.Ds. The parties shall, hereinafter, be referred to as they are arrayed in W.P. No. 33167 of 1997 which was filed questioning the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad in I.D. No.59 of 1996 dated 26.06.1997.
2. The petitioner, along with others, had hitherto invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking regularisation of his services. On the ground that they had an alternate remedy under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the Act), the petitioners were relegated to avail the remedy under the Act. Thereafter the Union, representing the petitioners, raised an Industrial Dispute. On the Central Government referring the dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, the awards in I.D. Nos.46 of 1
D.C. Dewan Mohideen Saheb & Sons v. United Bidi Workers Union
Executive Engineer, ZP Engg. Divn. v. Digambara Rao
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh v. State of Gujarat
Hussain Bhai Vs. The Alath Factory Tezhilali Union and Others
Hussain Bhai v. The Alath Factory Tezhilali Union AIR 1965 SC 1153
Pondicherry Khadi & Village Industries Board v. P. Kulothangan
Saroja v. Chinnusamy and Zonal Manager
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.