M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Jallarapu Laxman Rao – Appellant
Versus
Jallarapu Pedda Venkateswarlu – Respondent
1. These two revisions are filed by two different petitioners aggrieved by the order in Crl. MP No. 348 of 2017 in DVC No. 4 of 2017 dated 06.03.2017 passed by the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem and order in Crl. MP No. 172 of 2016 in DVC No. 4 of 2015 dated 27.04.2016 passed by the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial, respectively.
2. The common issue in these two matters is about maintainability of the revisions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against an interlocutory order passed by the Courts below in respective petitions.
3. In Crl. MP No. 348 of 2017 in DVC No. 4 of 2017, the Court below directed the employer of the respondent i.e. the General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. Kothaguda Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, to withhold an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- from and out of the retirement benefits of the respondent i.e. Jallarapu Laxman Rao, S/o Pedda Venkateswarlu. In Crl. MP No. 172 of 2016 in DVC No. 4 of 2015, the Court below ordered payment of interim maintenance of Rs. 5,000/- to the wife-second respondent herein. These two orders passed by two different Co
Chandrasekhara Pillai vs. Valsala Chandran
Chameli Singh vs. State of U.P. (1996) 2 SCC 549
Deepti alias Aarati Rai vs. Akhil Rai
Francis Coralle Mullin vs. Union Territory Delhi, Administrator
Gauri Shankar vs. Union of India
Krishnan and Another vs. Krishnaveni and Another
Preceline George vs. State of Kerala
Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. vs. Srvindbhai Rambhai Patel & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.