D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Koppolu Obanna (died) per LRs – Appellant
Versus
Bheemunipadu Abraham (died) Per LRs. – Respondent
1. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of the unsuccessful appellant/plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.2 of 1985, which was dismissed on 30.06.1997 by the Sub-ordinate Judge, Cuddapah.
2. The suit was filed by one K. Obanna for a declaration of his right and title to the plaint C-schedule property and other reliefs.
3. The suit was initially filed against one B. Abraham and Smt. B. Santhamma. The averments of the plaint are that B. Santhamma, second defendant and her mother purchased the A-schedule site by sale deed dated 25.03.1965. The mother relinquished her share in favour of the second defendant, vide a registered deed dated 03.02.1969. Thus, the second defendant became the owner of the entire property, which is described as B-schedule property. Thereafter, in 1984 after the property was developed, the second defendant gifted B-schedule property in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is the brother of the second defendant. The second defendant also executed a rectification deed to correct an error in the said gift deed. This property is the C-schedule property of the plaint. As per the plaint, the husband of the second defendant viz., the first defendant an
Jayadayal Poddar v. Bibi Hazra
Kapuganti Jagannadha Gupta v. District Registrar
M. Krishna Rao and another v. M.L. Narasikha Rao and others
Renikuntla Rajamma v. K. Sarwanamma
Sharada Bai v. Jamuna Bai and others
Srikakulam and others and Sudhakara Reddy v. Lakshmamma.
Thakur Bhim Singh v. Thakur Kan Singh.
V. Shankaranarayana Rao (died) by LRs v. Leelavathi (died) by LRs
Vidyadhar Krishnarao Mungi and others, v. Usman Gani Saheb Konkani and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.