IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.
V.Radhakrishna and others – Petitioners
Versus
Alla Rama Krishna Reddy and another – Respondents
Criminal Petition No.11861 of 2017
Decided On : 05-01-2018
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Indian Penal Code,1860 – Sections 500 and 501- Quash of Criminal Proceedings – Defamation – Held, Complainant has no locus standi to file a complaint and that the alleged defamatory statement is only against Y.S.R. Congress Party and not against any other person to claim as person aggrieved – If the allegations made in the charge sheet or F.I.R., taken on their face value, would not constitute any offence or absurd or if the charge sheet is filed to wreck vengeance against the accused, abusing process of the Court, the Court may exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. – Proceedings quashed – Appeal allowed (Para 117,127,128)
Facts of the Case:
Member of YSR Congress Party filed private complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 500 and 501 of I.P.C. alleging that he has been serving the poor and down trodden in his constituency and is well known for his loyalty to the YSR Congress Party and has been advancing the interests, policies and programmes of YSR Congress Party in his constituency and also in Andhra Pradesh as a MLA of YSR Congress Party and active party functionary, being aggrieved by the defamatory, derogatory and venomous news which is devoid of truth, published by the petitioners/accused.
Finding of Court:
Complainant has no locus standi to file a complaint and that the alleged defamatory statement is only against Y.S.R.Congress Party and not against any other person to claim as person aggrieved – If the allegations made in the charge sheet or F.I.R., taken on their face value, would not constitute any offence or absurd or if the charge sheet is filed to wreck vengeance against the accused, abusing process of the Court, the Court may exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. – Proceedings quashed.
Result: Appeal allowed
1. This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short Cr.P.C.) to quash the C.C.No.791 of 2017 on the file of the XVII Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 500 and 501 of Indian Penal Code (for short I.P.C.), on various grounds.
2. Respondent No.1 A.Ramakrishna Reddy is the complainant before the Magistrate, he is the MLA, Mangalagiri Constituency in Guntur District being the member of YSR Congress Party filed private complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 500 and 501 of I.P.C. alleging that he has been serving the poor and down trodden in his constituency and is well known for his loyalty to the YSR Congress Party and has been advancing the interests, policies and programmes of YSR Congress Party in his constituency and also in Andhra Pradesh as a MLA of YSR Congress Party and active party functionary, being aggrieved by the defamatory, derogatory and venomous news which is devoid of truth, published by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 in Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily on 15.05.2017 and on 16.05.2017.
3. Petitioner No.1/accused No.1 is the Managing Director, Amodha Publications Pvt. Ltd, publishing a Telugu Daily newspaper on the name and style of Andhra Jyothi. Other petitioners i.e. petitioner No.2/accused No. 2 is the Printer & Publisher, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily being published on behalf of Amodha Publications Pvt. Ltd at Amodha press. The petitioner No.3/accused No. 3 is the Editor, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily. The petitioner/accused No. 4 is the Bureau Chief, Telangana Edition, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily. The petitioner/accused No. 5 is the Reporter, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily. The petitioner/accused No. 6 is the Bureau In-charge, Amodha Publications Pvt. Ltd, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily, Andhra Edition. The petitioner/accused No. 7 is the Bureau In-charge, Amodha Publications Pvt. Ltd, Andhra Jyothi Telugu Daily, Andhra Edition.
4. It is contended that a news item that is formulated is being put before the accused no. 1 to 4 and 6 & 7 by the accused no. 5 i.e., reporter and thus it is being selected to be published before it takes a shape and appears in the newspaper in Black & White.
5. It is alleged that all the petitioners being the Managing Director, Printer and Publisher, Editor, Bureau Chief, Reporter, Bureau in-charge published two news items on 15-05-2017 and 16.05.2017, which are defamatory by making serious allegations against Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy, president of Y.S.R.Congress Party and Y.S.R. congress party. The alleged defamatory, derogatory news items published in the Andhra Jyothi News Paper are libellous, scandalous, untruthful, unfounded, per se defamatory and they were published to promote selfish ends of Telugu Desam party by distorting the true facts about the meeting Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy and the party members the Honble Prime Minister and by twisting the representation submitted there at and thus defaming Sri. Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy and YSR Congress Party without due care or caution in Andhra Jyothi Telugu daily main edition both in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh with the caption (both vernacular and translated news items are appended to this judgment as annexure) and with Subtitles The crux of the publication is that
6. With these captions a totally distorted version published, the personality, name and fame of Y.S Jagan Mohan Reddy and YSR Congress Party are tarnished, the defamatory article as a banner item was published. It is as follows:
7. Further, it is alleged that the petitioners totally distorted the personal representation dated 09.05.2017 submitted by Sri. Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy to the Honble Prime Minister Sri. Narendra Modi on 10.05.2017 where in fact the personal representation submitted deals with defection of the MLAs in Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly through corrupt means, the plight of Agri Gold Depositors, owes of Chil
Narottamdas L Shah v. Subanali Nazarali
John Thomas v. Dr.K.Jagadeesan
P.S.Meherhomji v. K.T.Vijay Kumar
Deobrat Shastri v. Rang Bahadur Singh
Nath Sen and another v. Rajat Kanti Ehadra
Balasaheb Keshav Thackeray v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
M.S. Jayaraj v. Commissioner of Excise, Kerala
Sahib Singh Mehra v. State of U.P.
E.M. Sankaran Namboodripad v. T. Narayanan Nambiar
I.E.Newspapers v. Union of India
Rajendra Sail v. Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association and Ors.
Dr. D.C. Saxena, Contemnor V. the Chief Justice of India
Maksud Saiyed v. State of Gujarat
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. Datar Switchgear Ltd.
Pepsi Food Ltd. and Anr. v. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.