B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Ramayanam Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Thamada Bhaskara Rao – Respondent
This Second Appeal is arisen out of the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2017 in A.S.No.129 of 2013 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Kakinada, against the dismissal of the claim petition in E.A.No.245 of 2012 in E.P.No.115 of 2011 in O.S.No.498 of 2010 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada filed by the non-possessory unregistered sale agreement holder as claimant by name, Ramayanam Satish Kumar against the decree holder by name, Thamada Bhaskara Rao of the money decree based on a promissory note said to have been executed by the judgment debtor by name, Smt. Pilla Supraja.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The parties herein are being referred with their names, to avoid confusion and for more clarity.
4. The facts in brief for the purpose of second appeal are that P. Supraja said to have been entered non-possessory unregistered contract for sale (agreement of sale) on 28.02.2010 for Rs.2,000/- per square yard for 161.16 square yards covered by Sy.No.290/2 of Ramanaiahpeta of Kakinada Rural Mandal within the Kakinada Municipal Corporation limits, which is a vacant house site surrounded by houses. The agreement holder, R. Satish Kumar entered the ag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.