The plaintiff is the appellant in Second Appeal and the defendants 1 to 10 are the respondents and out of said defendants, from death of the defendants 2 & 9, the legal representatives came on record as the respondents 10 to 13 and respondent No.14 respectively as per the orders dated 11.06.2008 in S.A.M.P.No.1550 of 2007 and 11.10.2017 in S.A.M.P.No.2203 of 2017. The Second Appeal is maintained against the concurrent findings of the Courts below by saying it involves the substantial question of law and the said concurrent findings are perverse and unsustainable and contrary to law. The Second Appeal was admitted originally on 21.11.2003 showing the substantial questions of law raised in the grounds 1 to 4, though as contemplated by Section 100 CPC the Court has to formulate the substantial question of law from reading of the material and after hearing the appellant, if any, or relied upon any ground mentioned in the appeal as if the substantial question of law for maintainability of the Second Appeal arising of the substantial question of law no doubt mandatory for the appellant, and the scope of the formulation of substantial question of law by the Court therefrom is thu