1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order, dated 05.07.2013, in EA.No.48 of 2013 in O.S.No.25 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Krishna at Vijayawada.

2. EA.No.48 of 2013 is filed under Order VII Rule 14 of CPC by the petitioner in the lower Court (by the claim petitioner in the claim petition) to receive the documents, which are filed along with the said application. The respondent filed a counter stating that the documents cannot be received in evidence. His particular objection was about document No.4, which is an agreement of sale dated 06.10.1974. The objection raised in the counter is that the document cannot be received as evidence as it is not validly stamped and is also not registered as required under law. The lower Court, after hearing the application, held that the objections raised are not sustainable in law and particularly, as the application is filed to condone the delay in receiving the documents. The application was allowed; the delay was condoned and the documents were directed to be received subject to proof and relevancy. It is this order that is questioned in this appeal.

3. This Court has heard Sri V. Nara