SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 62

G.V.SEETHAPATHY
Pariti Suryakanthamma – Appellant
Versus
Saripalli Srinivasa Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For The Petitioners:Jayanthi S.C. Sekhar, Advocate. For The Respondents:A. Rama Rao, Advocate.

ORDER:

1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 21-10-2009 in O.S.No.162 of 2005, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein an unmarked document dated 07-11-1990 described as partition list (pampakapu jabitha) was permitted to be admitted in evidence.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides. Perused the record.

3. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs. They filed the suit against the respondents/defendants for a declaration that they are the absolute owners of the plaint schedule house and for a permanent injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with their possession and enjoyment. The respondents/defendants filed written statement and contested the suit. During trial, evidence was recorded on both sides and the matter stood posted for arguments. At that stage, the defendants filed I.A.No.789 of 2008 to reopen the evidence and another I.A.No.790 of 2008 to recall D.W.1 for further chief examination. The said applications were allowed on 31-08-2009. During the further chief-examination of D.W.1 the defendants sought to mark an unregistered document titled as ‘pampakapu jabitha’ (partition list)





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top