SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 428

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Zulfikar Hussian – Appellant
Versus
Zainab Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.S.R. Anjaneyulu

ORDER :

B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J.

1. The revision petitioner is defendant No. 18 in O.S. No. 57 of 2000 in all the 4 revisions by name Zulfikar Hussain. The revision respondents are the plaintiffs and other defendants. CRP. No. 1886 of 2017 was filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 25.01.2017 in I.A. No. 391 of 2016 in O.S. No. 57 of 2000, where the Tribunal has allowed the petition by reopening the suit for adducing further evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to respondent Nos. 15 to 19/defendant Nos. 15 to 19 on or before 30.01.2017. Challenging the said order in I.A. No. 391 of 2016, CRP. No. 6452 of 2017 was filed subsequently under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, from one of the arguments raised in CRP. No. 1886 of 2017 of not maintainable invoking Article 227, but for to file under Section 83 of the Wakf Act (for short 'the Act').

2. CRP. No. 2720 of 2017 was filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order dated 25.01.2017 in I.A. No. 390 of 2016 in O.S. No. 57 of 2000, where the Tribunal has allowed the petition and the documents now produced by the plaintiffs shall be received subjec












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top