V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. All these civil revision petitions are filed under Section 91 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, challenging an order passed by the Joint Collector, under Section 90(1) of the Act

2. We have heard Mr. Shanmuga Sundaram, learned Senior Counsel, Sri C. Raghu, Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon-Mr. D. Hanumantha Rao and Mr. D. Jagan Mohan Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for some of the respondents, Mr. E. Ajay Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for some of the respondents and Mr. Vijay B. Paropakari, learned Counsel appearing for the impleaded parties.

3. The case on hand has a chequered history with litigation multiplying at every opportunity and the parties on all sides competing with each other to reach the peak of unscrupulousness.

4. As if to add more complexity to the facts as well as the legal issues into this already complicated litigation, all the parties to this litigation, without exception, have come out only with half facts. Therefore, to the extent possible, we have put together the bits and pieces that are scattered around and