1. A factual narrative going back to over seven decades; competing claims and proceedings under two legislative regimes; incoherent and often mutually contradictory assertions and responses presented before statutory, quasi-judicial and judicial authorities; rights predicated upon ambiguous records, often alluded to and less often brought on record; reliefs sought without fidelity to jurisdictional limitations and/or settled juridical norms of repose like res-judicata and irrevocably concluded proceedings; orders by statutory, quasi-judicial and judicial authorities without reference to all applicable legal norms and binding precedents on areas of jurisdiction and effect of irreversibly concluded proceedings; suppression of relevant facts including those that go to the root of jurisdiction; a blitzkrieg of random and occasionally vagrant litigation; competing assertions as to locus-standi deficit; and an order of remit by the apex Court with a specific direction to consider enumerated and other issues that may be raised, comprise the bouquet (or the strange alchemy if you will) of facts and circumstances that constitute the substratum of these Revisions. We now proceed to un