SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 785

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Banavatu Balabadu Naik – Appellant
Versus
Indian Bank, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.S.R Subrahmanyam
For the Respondent: P. Bala Rani and P. Bhaskara Mohan

ORDER :

U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner for issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records and quash the impugned order dated 4.7.2002 of the 4th respondent as confirmed by the 5th respondent by order dated 21.2.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential service benefits.

2. The factual matrix of the case is thus:

(a) The petitioner who is a Scheduled Tribe candidate was appointed as Clerk in the respondent Bank on 3.6.1980 at Malkapur, Warangal and thereafter he was promoted from time to time and while he was working as Branch Manager, Indian Bank in Machavaram Branch, he was issued with charge-sheet dated 22.2.1999 by the 2nd respondent with 10 charges directing him to submit his explanation. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted his explanation on 24.4.1999. While so, the 2nd respondent issued amended charge-sheet dated 11.5.1999 asking the petitioner to submit his explanation within seven days. The petitioner submitted his explanation. Being not satisfied with the explanation submitted by the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top