D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Nemani Suryanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Wilfred Kolady Rabindranadth – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The revision petitioner before this Court is an unsuccessful tenant against whom two concurrent orders were passed in R.C.C.No.13 of 2014, dated 11.08.2017, passed by the learned Special Officer Cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada and in R.C.A.No.8 of 2017, dated 07.06.2019, passed by the learned Rent Appellate Controller-cum-Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada respectively. Both the cases in the lower Courts went against tenant and in favour of the landlord. The tenant was directed to evict and handover the premises. Questioning the same the present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1990 (in short “the Act”).
2. This Court has heard Sri V.R.N. Prashanth representing Indus Law Firm for the revision petitioner and Sri S. Subba Reddy representing the respondents.
3. For the sake of convenience, the facts and parties are referred to as arrayed in the Civil Revision Petition.
4. The landlord-tenant relationship etc., are not really in doubt. The essential questions that arise for consideration are –
(a) Whether the landlord was successful in proving the case in order to get an order
Arnavaz Rustom Printer, Mumbai v N.D.Thadani
Central Bank of India v Tarseema Compress Wood Manufacturing Company and Ors.
Fatima Bi v Mohd.Akbar Hussain
G. Ganga Reddy v P. Madhavaiah
Gundu Preemsagar v Nagabandi Jayashankar
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., v Dilbahar Singh
J. Jermons v Aliammal and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.