State Bank of India a Corporate Body Constituted Under State Bank of India Act VS State of A. P. through SHO P. S. Samalkota, E. G. Dist

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAMESH RANGANATHAN
State Bank of India a Corporate Body Constituted Under State Bank of India Act – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. through SHO P. S. Samalkota, E. G. Dist – Respondent

ORDER :

1. Seeking to have the proceedings in Cr. No. 188 of 2004 of Samarlakota Police Station, East Godavari District quashed, the State Bank of India, Central office, Mumbai represented by its Chairman and the State Bank of India, Samarlakota branch represented by its Manager, (Accused 1 and 2 in Cr. No. 188 of 2004), have filed Criminal Petition No. 5480 of 2004.

2. Seeking to have the same proceedings in Cr. No. 188 of 2004 of Samarlakota police Station, East Godavari District quashed, Sri G. Rama Krishna Rao, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Draksharamam branch, East Godavari District and Sri H. Maitesh, Chief Manager (CR), State Bank of India, Balanagar branch, Hyderabad, (Accused No. 3 and 4 in Cr. No. 188 of 2004), have filed Crl.P. No. 1333 of 2005. Since the proceedings in Cr. No. 188 of 2004 of Samarlakota police station are sought to be quashed in both the criminal petitions, they were heard together and are now being disposed of by a common order. The complaint filed, against Accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Cr. No. 188 of 2004, is for offences under Sections 409, 467, 471 and 511 IPC.

3. The allegations, in the complaint filed in Cr. No. 188 of 2004, are that the 2nd responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

RAMESH RANGANATHANState Bank of India a Corporate Body Constituted Under State Bank of India Act – AppellantVersusState of A. P. through SHO P. S. Samalkota, E. G. Dist – Respondent

RAMESH RANGANATHAN
State Bank of India a Corporate Body Constituted Under State Bank of India Act – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. through SHO P. S. Samalkota, E. G. Dist – Respondent