SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JAGANNADHA RAO
D. Vinoda – Appellant
Versus
B. Basava Raju – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

1. This appeal raises the question regarding the computation of damages consequent to the death of an 'agriculturist' u/s 110-B, Motor Vehicles Act.

2. The deceased died in an accident on 27-2-1980 leaving behind him his wife, four children and mother. At the time of his death he was aged 38 years. He was an agriculturist and it is in evidence that he was having 8 acres of land and about ten cattle. Though it is argued that no documentary evidence is filed in this behalf, in view of the absence of any cross-examination on this question, I am of the view that the evidence regarding his owning 8 acres of land and ten cattle is to be accepted. The evidence also is that income from these properties was Rs 600/- p.m. The total claim in the petition is only for a sum of Rs. 30,000/- with interest and the lower tribunal had awarded only a sum of Rs. 7,500/- on the peculiar reasoning, namely, that the death was not a loss to the family pecuniarily, inasmuch as the claimants have received intact, the property left behind by the deceased and that nominal compensation would meet the ends of justice. The case is yet another example where the claimants lawyer has clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top