JUDGMENT:

The plaintiff is the appellant in both these appeals and that he is the petitioner in CRP No.4873 of 2006. Both these appeals are preferred against the decree and judgment dated 27.03.2003 in O.S.No.98 of 1994 in refusing the principal relief sought in the suit for specific performance of contract under the suit agreement for sale dated 14.10.1990 and in allowing the counter claim filed by the deceased 1st respondent and his son 2nd respondent directing delivery of possession of item No.1 of plaint schedule.

2. The relief sought in the suit by the appellant against the respondents 1 to 4 is as under:

“(i) to pass a decree in favour of plaintiff and against defendants 1 to 4 to execute a sale deed in favour of plaintiff for item-1 of plaint schedule land and in case they failed to do so the Court to execute the sale deed;

(ii) for any reason specific performance of agreement court not be decreed, to grant a decree for Rs.95,000/- representing return of consideration paid and compensation with interest at 12% per annum from date of suit till date of realisation against defendants 1 and 2

(iii) award costs of the suit against defendants 1 and 2

(iv) grant such other reliefs which