M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Doddi Hanumantha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the Panchanama dated 18.01.2021 whereunder the respondents seized the petitioner’s Fair Price Shop and also questioned the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Rcf/51/2021 dated 15.03.2021 suspending the authorization of the petitioner pertaining to his Fair Price Shop bearing No.0813043 of Timmayapalem Village, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District, without conducting enquiry and withing giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as permanent Dealer of Fair Price Shop No.0813043 of Timmayapalem Village, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District. Since the date of his appointment, he was discharging his duties by distributing the essential commodities to the cardholders without any complaint and maintaining the records properly. For the month of January, 2021, the petitioner has received the essential commodities and distributed the same to the card holders. On 18.01.2021, the 4th respondent and his office subordinates inspected the shop of the petitioner and verified the stock
B.Manjula v. District Collector, Civil Supplies, Kurnool and others
C.Durga Srinivas Rao and others vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others
Gurdial Singh Fijji v. State of Punjab
Hindustan Times Limited v. Union of India
Jawahar Lal Singh v. Naresh Singh and others
Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Co., of India Ltd. v. Union of India and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.