U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Ramanjaneya Prasanna Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent, who is the Executive Officer of Sri Varasiddhi Vinayaka Swami Vari Devasthanam, Kanipakam, in awarding tender to the 4th respondent pursuant to tender notification No.3632/S/2019, dated 03.02.2020 is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for consequential order.
2. Notification No.3632/S/2019, dated 03.02.2020 was issued by 3rd the respondent inviting tenders for providing housekeeping, mechanized sanitation, sweeping and service to Sri Varasiddi Vinayaka Swami Vari Devasthanam, Kanipakam from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 through e-procurement platform. Earlier, similar notification was issued for the period from 01.01.2020 to 31.12.2021 and in response thereof, the petitioner, the 4th respondent herein and three others submitted their bids. However, the 3rd respondent cancelled the said notification and issued the present notification. At the present instance, the petitioner and 4th respondent alone submitted
ABL International Limited v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited
Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Jasmshed Hormusji Wadia v. Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited v. The State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.