IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J.
B. Ramakoteswara Rao - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 3198 of 2021
Decided On : 07-05-2021
Constitution of India - Writ petition - Article 226 – To declare the action of respondents in placing services of the petitioner by way of deputation as a faculty member of Police Training College, Anantapuramu, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to the law - That there is no request to depute the services of the petitioner in the Police Training College and no special reasons are assigned for deputing the petitioner – Respondents claimed that the writ petition is filed after lapse of one year and that on the said ground alone, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed – Whether appeal is barred by limitation - Whether the petitioner, a Police Inspector, could be, without his consent, deputed to the Civil Defence Organisation –
Finding of the court : The action of the respondent in appointing a police officer as Director of Prosecution, that is, in charge of the Prosecution Agency of the State, is wholly illegal and violative of the very letter and spirit of Sections 24 and 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - It is true that limitation does not strictly apply to proceedings Under Articles 32 or 226 of the Constitution of India such rights cannot be enforced after an unreasonable lapse of time. Consideration of unexplained delays and inordinate laches would always be relevant in writ actions, and writ courts naturally ought to be reluctant in exercising their discretionary jurisdiction to protect those who have slept over wrongs and allowed illegalities to fester. Fence-sitters cannot be allowed to barge into courts and cry for their rights at their convenience, and vigilant citizens ought not to be treated alike with mere opportunists –
Result :Writ petition allowed.
ORDER :
K. Vijaya Lakshmi, J.
1. This writ petition is filed to "declare the action of respondents in placing services of the petitioner by way of deputation as a faculty member of Police Training College, Anantapuramu, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and a consequential direction was sought to set aside the R.O. Rt. No. 219 Home (Courts-A) Department dated 27.02.2020 and to direct the respondents to place the petitioner as full additional charge of Director of Prosecutions'.
2. Case of the petitioner is that, the prosecution officers were organized as cadre in the State of Andhra Pradesh and Rules were framed vide G.O.Ms. No. 188 called as 'The Andhra Pradesh state Prosecution Services rules, 1992' (for short 'the Rules'); these rules provide for (i) seven categories of posts in Prosecution Services of Andhra Pradesh (ii) the method of recruitment and (iii) the qualifications etc.; petitioner practiced as an Advocate for more than seven years and was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor category-7 cadre on 06.11.1998; in the year 2000, the 1st respondent notified vacancies for the posts of Additional Public Prosecutors - Grade-II (Category-5) and the petitioner participated in the said selection and stood first in the combined State of Andhra Pradesh and was selected for the said post and later was promoted as Public Prosecutor, Grade-II (Category-4) on 12.01.2012; he was promoted as Public Prosecutor/Joint Director, which is Category-3 post, on 09.01.2018 and as Additional Director, which is category-2 post on 21.02.2019; while working as Joint Director i.e., in Category-3, since he was the senior most, he was placed as full Additional charge of the post of Additional Director (Category-2) and also was kept in charge to look after the administrative work of the Directorate, vide Govt. Memo dated 15.02.2018; while working as Additional Director, category-2, he was placed as Full Additional Charge of the post of Director, (Category-1) on 21.02.2019; while so, the 1st respondent issued G.O.Rt. No. 219 Home (Courts-a) Department dated 27.02.2020, placing the services of the petitioner to work on deputation in the Police Training College, Anantapuramu, as a faculty member duly relieving him from holding the post of full additional charge of Post of director of Prosecutions; there is only one post of Faculty Member in the Police Training College, Anantapuramu, which is manned by Category-6 of the Prosecution cadre; petitioner was holding the post of Category-2 i.e., four posts above the said post in the hierarchy of posts of Prosecution cadre, which is the second highest post in the hierarchy; no consent was obtained from the petitioner, which is mandatory for all deputations; pursuant to the impugned order, petitioner joined in Police Training College on 02.03.2020 and went on leave from 03.03.2020; the Principal, Police Training College, vide letter dated 05.09.2020 informed the 2nd respondent that there is no deputation post of Additional Director of Prosecution to work as Faculty Member in the Police Training college and that there is only one post of faculty member, which is of the rank of Senior Assistant Public Prosecutor (category-6) in the said college and the same is filled and that there is no vacancy; Rule 3 of the Service Rules have been amended vide G.O. ms. No. 24 dated 04.02.2020, providing for appointment of an Advocate, who has been in practice for not less than 10 years, including a Public Prosecutor/Additional Public Prosecutor/Assistant Public Prosecutor, who has put in not less than ten years of service to the post of Director of Prosecutions and the said amendment is contrary to the very object and scheme of Section 24 read with Section 25-A of Cr.P.C.; petitioner submitted representations dated 10.08.2020, 30.09.2020, 30.11.2020 and on 29.12.2020
Umapati Choudhary vs. State of Bihar
State of Punjab vs. Inder Singh
Ashok Kumar Ratilal Patel vs. Union of India
Sub Inspector Rooplal vs. Lt. Governor Delhi
P.S. Sadasivaswamy vs. State of Tamilnadu
Krishan Singh Kundu vs. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.